<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.michigantaxblog.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>Michigan Tax Law Articles, Blog &amp; Documents | Foster Swift</title>
					<link>https://www.michigantaxblog.com/category/tax-credits</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.michigantaxblog.com/category/tax-credits?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to Michigan Tax Law Articles, Blog &amp; Documents.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 07:57:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>How Much is “Too Much”? Understanding Reasonable Compensation for Business
Owners</title>
				<link>https://www.michigantaxblog.com/reasonable-compensation-business-owners-irs-audit-risks-best-practices</link>
<dc:creator>Michael C. Zahrt, Zachary W. Miller (Summer Associate)</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>reasonable-compensation-business-owners-irs-audit-risks-best-practices</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>For owners of closely held businesses, compensation planning is more than just a business decision&mdash;it&rsquo;s a tax strategy that can invite IRS scrutiny and the recharacterization of compensation if not handled carefully.</p> <p><strong>Why Compensation Matters</strong></p> <p>The tax rules allow businesses to deduct &ldquo;reasonable&rdquo; compensation paid to employees, including owner-employees. But when compensation is considered too high, the IRS can reclassify the excess as a dividend. This creates a mixed result: the individual may benefit from lower dividend tax rates, but the company loses a valuable&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Energy Credits Under Scrutiny: What Strieby Means for Investors and
Partnerships</title>
				<link>https://www.michigantaxblog.com/energy-credits-tax-credits-strieby-means-investors-partnerships</link>
<dc:creator>Nicholas J. Stock II, Michael C. Zahrt</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>energy-credits-tax-credits-strieby-means-investors-partnerships</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:00:02 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>IRS has made a habit of challenging whether a member of a limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for tax purposes is materially participating in the activities of the partnership.</p> <p>A recent Tax Court case (<em>Strieby v. Commissioner</em>) considers whether the passive activity credit limitation rules of Code Section 469 may prevent taxpayers from claiming energy credits allocated to them by virtue of their membership interests in a partnership.<a name="_ftnref1" href="#_ftn1"><span>[1]</span></a></p> <p><u>Facts Presented</u>.</p> <p>In <em>Strieby</em>, taxpayers invested in a solar farm but their only involvement consisted merely of completing&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>