Tax Law Blog
For owners of closely held businesses, compensation planning is more than just a business decision—it’s a tax strategy that can invite IRS scrutiny and the recharacterization of compensation if not handled carefully.
Why Compensation Matters
The tax rules allow businesses to deduct “reasonable” compensation paid to employees, including owner-employees. But when compensation is considered too high, the IRS can reclassify the excess as a dividend. This creates a mixed result: the individual may benefit from lower dividend tax rates, but the company loses a valuable deduction—resulting in higher corporate taxes.
This issue is especially common in closely held companies, where owners have the authority to set their own pay, and even more so in family-owned companies where family members are compensated on a percent of revenue basis, resulting in extremely high compensation.
There Is No Bright-Line Rule
One of the biggest challenges is that “reasonable” is not clearly defined. Instead, courts evaluate a variety of factors, including:
- The owner’s role, experience, and contributions;
- Company size, complexity, and profitability;
- Compensation paid to similar executives in comparable businesses;
- Whether the company pays dividends; and
- The company’s overall compensation policies.
Courts also frequently apply the “independent investor test,” which asks whether an outside investor would view the compensation as reasonable given the return on investment. If the compensation appears reasonable or appropriate to an outside investor, it will be subject to less scrutiny.
Lessons from Recent Cases
Recent court decisions highlight patterns that business owners should understand.
First, large bonuses, especially when they replace dividends, can raise red flags. In one case, a business owner paid himself multi-million-dollar bonuses, but the court disallowed a substantial portion, citing lack of objective support and concerns that compensation decisions were not independent.
Second, documentation matters. Courts look more favorably on businesses with formal compensation agreements, clear bonus formulas, and consistent policies. In contrast, ad hoc or year-end decisions without a structured process are more vulnerable to challenge. When compensation agreements or schedules are implemented, scrutiny is limited, especially when ratified by the board or by another authority within the company.
Third, performance-based pay can be defensible, most notably when tied to measurable results and applied consistently. Companies that follow established compensation plans and demonstrate a clear link between pay and performance tend to fare better against funds being recharacterized.
Finally, an owner’s impact on the business is critical. Courts recognize that key individuals may deserve higher compensation when their efforts directly drive growth, profitability, or survival during difficult periods. Owners who have a significant positive impact on the business often face less scrutiny when compensation is being analyzed for reasonableness.
Practical Takeaways for Business Owners
If you are an owner-employee, now is a good time to review your compensation strategy:
- Benchmark compensation. Use industry data to justify salary levels.
- Document decisions. Maintain written employment agreements and board approvals.
- Adopt a consistent plan. Structured bonus formulas and performance metrics strengthen your position.
- Balance salary and distributions. Paying only compensation (and no dividends) may trigger scrutiny.
- Consider your “independent investor story.” Would an outside investor view your compensation as reasonable given company performance?
Bottom Line
Reasonable compensation continues to be a gray area and a frequent audit target. The key is not just what you pay yourself, but how you justify it. With thoughtful planning and proper documentation, business owners can reduce risk, preserve deductions, and withstand scrutiny if the IRS comes knocking.
Reasonable compensation is one of the most scrutinized areas for closely held businesses, and the consequences of getting it wrong can be severe. Our tax attorneys can help you evaluate owner compensation, benchmark salaries against industry standards, document compensation decisions, and create a tax-efficient strategy that aligns with your business goals.
- Shareholder
Mike is a business and estate planning lawyer in the Grand Rapids office of Foster Swift and is the current co-leader of the firm's Business & Tax practice group. His area of expertise is business succession planning. This involves not ...
